Cursor session → Claude Code
After a long Cursor thread, push the summary into grphly. Next
day in Claude Code, fetch it — same stack decisions, no re-brief.
kb push """
Session summary (Cursor, auth refactor):
- Auth0 + Google social only; no local passwords
- Access tokens audience = https://grphly-dev.miless.app/mcp
- Callbacks: localhost:8787 + Claude auth_callback
- Rejected: rolling our own JWT store
Open: invite email copy still draft
"""
kb fetch What did we decide about auth and callbacks?
ChatGPT research → team Cursor
Cofounder researches pricing and competitors in ChatGPT, pushes
the condensed notes. You open Cursor and fetch the market context
without reading their chat log.
kb push """
ChatGPT research dump — competitor memory tools:
- Mem0: strong SDK, weaker shared-team KB story
- Our wedge: shared kb_id + invite by Google email
- Pricing hypothesis: free solo, paid seats for orgs
Sources discussed: mem0.ai, Reddit MCP threads
"""
kb fetch What's our wedge vs Mem0 and pricing hypothesis?
Claude design review → agency handoff
Client constraints come out of a Claude review. Push the full
brief into a client KB. Anyone on the account fetches rules
instead of reinventing the stack.
kb create acme-rebrand "Acme Q2 site"
kb push """
Claude design review — Acme Q2:
Must: custom CSS only, no Tailwind, WCAG AA
Deploy: Vercel, preview URLs for stakeholders
Tone: quiet, technical, no emoji in UI copy
Out of scope: mobile app, CMS migration
"""
kb fetch What CSS and deploy constraints does Acme have?